
Just before the iPad launched earlier this year, many “analysts” cried that the iPad would kill the Kindle. A new study has “analysts” once again crying that the iPad is killing the Kindle.
First off, calling the iPad an E-reader is idiotic at best. E-ink mimics a real book in just about every way, except resolution (150 vs. 300+). An iPad’s LCD display mimics a book as much as netbooks or TVs do. Should a book be read or watched?
Many believe that the iPad is naturally superior because it is more versatile, being able to watch movies, browse the interweb, check email, play Angry Birds, and it is more expensive, so it has to be better. Most of these people jerk off to famous hot chicks rather than the comely chick who frequents the laundry-mat down the street who is just attractive enough to fuel two or three years worth of masturbatory fantasies, but far too hot to actually approach, engage in conversation, respond to an invitation to a roll in the sack, and leave utterly disappointed. so, how the fuck would these pieces of shit know anything about technology. If one needs a device to actually read (and I mean read books and shit) the kindle is far superior to the iPad. If a user needs to check his fantasy football league, so that he may reassert his heterosexuality to a group of men who also wish to assert their heterosexuality while talking about watching other sweaty men run, grab, and roll over each other like greco-roman foreplay, the the iPad might be for you. The kindle is for people who read books. Not people who read magazines, newspapers, or the little announcements given out at all of the funerals for the many friends who died from AIDS. If you don’t read books, then you will never understand how a Kindle could be a superior e-Reader. You will also spend your life living in ignorance and never really able to understand things such as how a bill becomes a law.
Yes, an iPad has color, can do motion, and has a touch screen, “features that the Kindle does not have.” Apparently children need color, presentations are useful only if they are in color, it is backlit, and books should have animations as well. The kindle does have a web-browser and a connection to Al Gore’s World Wide Web via Wifi or free 3G goodness. It is far less functional than a browser on the average computer and the iPad. The Kindle can play audio books and MP3s, but it is easier to select a song on an eight-track than on the Kindle’s MP3 player. What about the features a Kindle has that an iPad doesn’t? Need help with this? First, text looks better on a kindle because it is E-ink. Vector images designed to be printed in black and white look fucking awesome. Books, strangely enough, lack a touch screen, so of course a device designed to mimic a book would lack a touch screen. The kindle is not back lit, but it is, again, mimicking a fucking book, which traditionally are quite lacking in back-lightening as well. Free 3G is kinda cool. A two to four week batter life is slightly better than an eight hour battery life.
Speaking of battery life, here is a hippy fact. Within one year of ownership, the Kindle will pay for its manufacture in energy costs verses consuming the same amount of content on traditional printed material. Since the iPad consumes about seventy times the amount of power to read the same content as a Kindle, it will never be a green alternative to the Kindle, much less traditional print material. If you use an iPad as an e-Reader over the Kindle, you are shitting on the environment. If you shit on the environment, you hate trees. If you hate trees, then you hate puppies. Buy a Kindle or you killed a dog.
The iPad is much larger than the standard Kindle (though it is smaller than the DX, but the Dx poans). For some users, the convenience of keeping the Kindle in a purse or bag and having it readily available, makes the Kindle infinitely useful. (Note, some users carry purses or bags large enough to fit several iPads, but they have giners, so, how would this not be a game killer for others?) In the realm of portability, the newer Android devices and the iPhone would make for much better Kindle killers than the larger iPad ever would.
As for this new study, ChangeWave did a study between Kindle and iPad owners over the past several months. The first part discusses how Amazon’s Kindle is loosing market share to Apple’s iPad. According to these numbers, the Kindle is falling way behind, despite the record sales of the new Kindle 2 in the past several months. How can this happen? The answer is somewhat easy, all Kindles are e-Readers, but not all iPads are e-Readers. If the number of sales of kindles is compared to all of the sales of iPads, and the iPad sells far greater numbers due to its attraction to the cock-hungry, then it will appear that the iPad is gaining market share. It would be better to compare the number of hours spent reading on each device or even better to compare the number of books consumed on each device than comparing apples to oranges. The second part compares the satisfaction users had with their purchases. I believe that the discrepancy in the numbers can be reflected by the number of individuals who bought a Kindle because they thought that the mere purchase of the device would either make them smarter or make them look smarter. the rest of it rattles on about expected holiday sales.
Basically, the Kindle is for two types of people, those intelligent enough to be interested in learning and want a way to remove books from the living quarters and have ready access to the majority of a personal library and for women who read crappy, cotton-candy for the mind Romance novels. The iPad is also for two types of people, those who want a portable computing device featuring a display with rather dated technology (the LCD is nearing the end of its life-cycle while Eink is in its infancy, but for a display that combines most of the best qualities of both, except for the tremendous energy savings that Eink provides, just look at Apple’s new iPhone 4) and the latent-homosexuals who wish nothing more than to be accepted by other hetero-posing breeders.
A word on the new Nook Color and other possible competition with Amazon. With access to root (sudo), the new Nook Color might make for a nifty little tablet device. However, buying a Nook Color as an e-Reader over any device with Eink is like gut-fucking, when you’re done with the transaction you just feel empty inside and no matter how hot going to town inside of a slowly dieing piece of fuck meat might be, plowing into giner is better and tighter.
Amazon’s real competition will come from Google’s announcement of Google Editions. I have recently fallen in love with Google. From the cloud computing of Google Docs to the awesomeness that is the Android OS, Google has begun to make me feel about computing the way Apple has told me to feel for the last twenty years. When a purpose-built device with Eink appears, amazon will be doomed.